1thin, or fine, [or silk brocade]—دِيبَاج
or thin, or fine, [q. v.]—حَرِير
Opposed to إِسْتَبْرَقٌ.
or the same as it—بِزْيَوْنٌ
IB explains it as meaning thin, or fine, ديباج; so in the TA under بزن.
or a kind of them, made of [the kind of down called] مِرْعِزَّى—بزيون
or a kind of them [plural of بُرْدٌ, q. v.]—بُرُود
[Golius, on the authority of Ibn-Maaroof: præstans et subtile panni serici genus; and, on the authority of J: Attalicus pannus, aurum argentumve intextum habens — though J explains it only by the word بِزْيَوْنٌ. It is mentioned in the S and Msb under سدس, and in the Msb it is said to be of the measure فُنْعُلٌ, but according to the K the ن is a radical letter.]
It is said to be an arabicized word, with no one disagreeing, as is إِسْتَبْرَقٌ; but both these words occur in the Qur'ān, and Esh-Sháfi'ee and others deny that any arabicized word occurs in it. [Bd (17:37) and others hold the opposite.] Some say that they are cases where different languages happen to agree.
on this sense latin_omitted
Lane cites “Jel in xviii. 30” — a commentary, not the verse; no modern number is given
Lane cites “Jel in xliv. 53” — a commentary, not the verse; no modern number is given
Show Lane's original text
Thin, or fine, دِيبَاج [or silk brocade]: (Th, M, Bd and Jel in xviii. 30, Jel in xliv. 53, Msb, K, TA:) or thin, or fine, حَرِير [q. v.]: (Bd in xliv.:) opposed to إِسْتَبْرَقٌ : (TA:) or i. q. بِزْيَوْنٌ [expl. by IB as meaning thin, or fine, ديباج : so in the TA in art. بزن ]: (S:) or a kind of بزيون ; (Lth, K, TA;) made of [the kind of down called] مِرْعِزَّى : (Lth, TA:) or a kind of بُرُود [pl. of بُرْدٌ , q. v.]: (M, K:) [accord. to Golius, præstans et subtile panni serici genus; as on the authority of Ibn-Maaroof: and Attalicus pannus, aurum argentumve intextum habens; as on the authority of J, who, however, explains it only by the word بِزْيَوْنٌ : it is mentioned in the S and Msb in art. سدس ; and in the latter, is said to be of the measure فُنْعُلٌ ; but accord. to the K, the ن is a radical letter:] it is [said to be] an arabicized word, without contradiction, (Lth, K,) as well as إِسْتَبْرَقٌ : (Lth:) but both these words occur in the Kur-án, and Esh-Sháfi'ee and others deny that any arabicized word occurs therein: [though they are opposed by Bd (xvii. 37) and others:] some say that they are instances of the agreement of different languages. (MF.)