muḍāriʿـَيَفْعَلُ·ـُيَفْعُلُ·ـِيَفْعِلُmaṣdarعِلْمٌ عَلْمٌ عَلَمٌ
Core sense — he knew it; he marked itgenerated
1.1he knew it, he was acquainted with it—عَرَفَهُ
.
Or it means he knew it truly and with certainty.
By what is said here, and by what is said later in the K, العِلْمُ and المَعْرِفَةُ and الشُّعُورُ are given one meaning; and that is close to what most of the lexicologists say.
But most of the critics distinguish each of them from the others. العِلْمُ denotes for them the highest degree, because it is the one they allow as an attribute of God; in the most correct language they did not call Him عَارِفٌ, nor شَاعِرٌ.
[For other differences between العِلْم and المَعْرِفَة — the first being wider in meaning than the second — see the first paragraph of art. عرف. Much might be added to what is said there, and in explanation of العِلْم from the TA, but not without controversy.]
he knew a thing with certainty—عَلِمَ
Explained as تَيَقَّنَ, [that is, he knew a thing both intuitively and by inference, as explained in art. يقن].
العِلْمُ is synonymous with اليَقِينُ, but it occurs with the meaning of الَمَعْرِفَةُ, just as المَعْرِفَةُ occurs with the meaning of العلْمُ: each carries the meaning of the other because each is preceded by ignorance [when it is not attributed to God].
Zuheyr, in his Muʿallaqah, uses it in the sense of وَأَعْرِفُ: [And I know what is known today, and what was known yesterday before it; but as to the knowledge of what tomorrow will bring, I am blind.]
shāhidوَأَعْلَمُ عِلْمَ اليَوْمِ وَٱلْأَمْسِ قَبْلَهُوَلٰكِنِّنِى عَنْ عِلْمِ مَا فِى غَدٍ عَمِ
you do not know them, but God knows them—لَا تَعْلَمُونَهُمْ اَللّٰهُ يَعْلَمُهُمْ
In the Qur'ān 8:62; explained as لَا تَعْرِفُونَهُمْ اَللّٰهُ يَعْرِفُهُمْ.
المَعْرِفَة is attributed to God because it is one of the two kinds of عِلْم [the intuitive and the inferential], and the distinction between them is conventional, resting on what each depends upon.
He is declared free of any prior ignorance and of any acquiring of knowledge, for He knows what has been and what will be, and how what will not be would be if it were; His عِلْم is an eternal and essential attribute.
When عَلِمَ denotes اليَقِين it [sometimes] takes two objects; but when it is synonymous with عَرَفَ it takes only one.
and if you know them to be believing women—فَإِنْ عَلِمْتُمُوهُنَّ مُؤْمِنَاتٍ
I knew myself to be—عَلِمْتُنِى
It takes two objects in the saying in the Qur'ān 60:10.
They likewise allowed this form, as they said رَأَيْتُنِى and حَسِبْتُنِى and the like.
Sometimes it carries the meaning of شَعَرَ, and is then followed by بِ.
he knew of it, he was aware of it—عَلِمَ بِهِ
Explained as شَعَرَ or شَعُرَ, according to different copies of the K.
[That is: he knew of it, was aware of it, or understood it; or he knew its minute particulars; or he perceived it by one of the senses; and sometimes it means he became informed of it; and sometimes, he became knowing in it.]
[In this sense, meaning شَعَرْتُ بِهِ, both forms are used.]
I knew it—عَلِمْتُهُ
I knew of it—عَلِمْتُ بِهِ
I did not know the news of his arrival—مَا عَلِمْتُ بِخَبَرِ قُدُومِهِ
Here it means مَا شَعَرْتُ.
he knew it—اعتلمهُ
That is, عَلِمَهُ.
know!—تَعَلَّمْ
Used in place of اِعْلَمْ.
I know that so-and-so is going out—تَعَلَّمْتُ أَنَّ فُلَانًا خَارِجٌ
ISk says this phrase stands in place of عَلِمْتُ.
know that Zeyd is going out—اِعْلَمْ أَنَّ زَيْدًا خَارِجٌ
I do know—قَدْ عَلِمْتُ
But when you are told تَعَلَّمْ أَنَّ زَيْدًا خَارِجٌ, you do not say قَدْ تَعَلَّمْتُ.
he knew the affair thoroughly—عَلِمَ الأَمْرَ
he learned the affair thoroughly—تَعَلَّمَهُ
According to IB, these two verbs are synonymous only in the imperative.
Both are explained as أَتْقَنَهُ, [apparently meaning he knew, or learned, the affair soundly and well: see art. تقن.]
[I think it not unlikely, though I do not find it in any copy of the K, that the right reading is أَيْقَنَهُ, which is synonymous with تَيَقَّنَهُ, since the explanation of عَلِمَ in the Msb, given above, is تَيَقَّنَ.]
they all knew him—تعالمهُ الجَمِيعُ
That is, عَلِمُوهُ.
1.1.1I knew what he knew—عَلِمْتُ عِلْمَهُ
[Literally I knew his knowledge; apparently meaning I tried or tested him, and so knew what he knew; and hence, I knew his case or condition, or his qualities.]
A phrase mentioned by Fr in explanation of رَبَأْتُ فِيهِ.
See رَبَأَ; see also the explanation of لَأَ خْبُرَنَّ خَبَرَكَ in the first paragraph of art. خبر, and غَبَنُوا خَبَرَهَا in art. غبن.
1.1.2God knows—يَعْلَمُ ٱللّٰهُ
عَلِمْتُ is also used like a verb of swearing, taking the same kind of complement, as in the line: [And I certainly knew that she would come in the evening.] See art. شهد.
shāhidوَلَقَدْ عَلِمْتُ لَتَأْتِيَنَّ عَشِيَّةً
This phrase is a form of asseveration; see قَيْرَوَانٌ, and an example in art. قير.
1.2he became learned, he came to possess knowledge—عَلُمَ
The M has عَلُمَ هُوَ نَفْسُهُ, and the K عَلِمَ هُوَ فِى نَفْسِهِ; but in this case the verb is correctly of the measure of كَرُمَ.
That is, he became such as is called عَالِم or عَلِيم, meaning he possessed knowledge as a faculty firmly rooted in his mind.
According to IB, the same as تعلّم [as an intransitive verb].
Also: he became equal to the عُلَمَآء [plural of عَالِمٌ and of عَلِيمٌ].
1.3
For عَالَمَهُ فَعَلَمَهُ, the muḍāriʿ of the second verb being عَلُمَ, see form 3.
1.4he marked it—عَلَمَهُ
[See also form 4.]
the synonym given is وَسَمَهُ.
I wound my turban with a mark by which its style would be known—عَلَمْتُ عِمَّتِى
1.5he slit his [upper] lip—عَلَمَ شَفَتَهُ
.
1.6he had a fissure in his upper lip—عَلِمَ
.
Said of a man; or the fissure is in one of the two sides of the lip.
Qur’ānic occurrences Form 1 5 shown of 340
78:4
كَلَّا سَيَعْلَمُونَVerily, they shall soon (come to) know!
78:5
ثُمَّ كَلَّا سَيَعْلَمُونَVerily, verily they shall soon (come to) know!
82:12
يَعْلَمُونَ مَا تَفْعَلُونَThey know (and understand) all that ye do.
102:3
كَلَّا سَوْفَ تَعْلَمُونَBut nay, ye soon shall know (the reality).
102:4
ثُمَّ كَلَّا سَوْفَ تَعْلَمُونَAgain, ye soon shall know!
Occurrences of this form in the Qur’ān, not Lane’s choice of verse. They show the word in use; they do not say which sense above applies. Where more occur than are shown, the shortest āyāt are chosen.
Show Lane's original text
, aor. عَلَمَ , inf. n. عِلْمٌ , He knew it; or he was, or became, acquainted with it; syn. عَرَفَهُ : (S, K:) or he knew it ( عَرَفَهُ ) truly, or certainly: (B, TA:) by what is said above, and by what is afterwards said in the K, العِلْمُ and المَعْرِفَةُ and الشُّعُورُ are made to have one meaning; and this is nearly what is said by most of the lexicologists: but most of the critics discriminate every one of these from the others; and العِلْمُ , accord. to them, denotes the highest quality, because it is that which they allow to be an attribute of God; whereas they did not say [that He is] عَارِفٌ , in the most correct language, nor شَاعِرٌ : (TA:) [respecting other differences between العِلْم and المَعْرِفَة , the former of which is more general in signification than the latter, see the first paragraph of art. عرف : much might be added to what is there stated on that subject, and in explanation of العِلْم , from the TA, but not without controversy:] or عَلِمَ signifies تَيَقَّنَ [i. e. he knew a thing, intuitively, and inferentially, as expl. in the Msb in art. يقن ]; العِلْمُ being syn. with اليَقِينُ ; but it occurs with the meaning of الَمَعْرِفَةُ , like as المَعْرِفَةُ occurs with the meaning of العلْمُ , each being made to import the meaning of the other because each is preceded by ignorance [when not attributed to God]: Zuheyr says, [in his Mo'allakah,] 1 meaning وَأَعْرِفُ [i. e. And I know the knowledge of the present day, and of yesterday before it; but to the knowledge of what will be to-morrow I am blind]: and it is said in the Kur [viii. 62], لَا تَعْلَمُونَهُمْ اَللّٰهُ يَعْلَمُهُمْ , meaning لَا تَعْرِفُونَهُمْ اَللّٰهُ يَعْرِفُهُمْ [i. e. Ye know them not, but God knoweth them]; المَعْرِفَة being attributed to God because it is one of the two kinds of عِلْم , [the intuitive and the inferential,] and the discrimination between them is conventional, on account of their different dependencies, though He is declared to be free from the imputation of antecedent ignorance and from acquisition [of knowledge], for He knows what has been and what will be and how that which will not be would be if it were, his عِلْم being an eternal and essential attribute: when عَلِمَ denotes اليَقِين , it [sometimes] has two objective complements; but as syn. with عَرَفَ , it has a single objective complement: (Msb:) it has two objective complements in the saying, in the Kur [lx. 10], فَإِنْ عَلِمْتُمُوهُنَّ مُؤْمِنَاتٍ [And if ye know them to be believers]; and [in like manner] they allowed one's saying عَلِمْتُنِى [meaning I knew myself to be], like as they said رَأَيْتُنِى and حَسِبْتُنِى &c.: (TA:) and sometimes it imports the meaning of شَعَرَ , and is therefore followed by بِ : (Msb:) [thus] عَلِمَ بِهِ signifies شَعَرَ or شَعُرَ (accord. to different copies of the K) [i. e. He knew it; as meaning he knew, or had knowledge, of it; was cognizant of it; or understood it: or he knew the minute particulars of it: or he perceived it by means of any of the senses: and sometimes this means he became informed, or apprised, of it: and sometimes, he was, or became, knowing in it]: or in this case, [as meaning شَعَرْتُ بِهِ ,] you say, عَلِمْتُهُ and عَلِمْتُ بِهِ [I knew it; &c.]: (Msb:) and one says, مَا عَلِمْتُ بِخَبَرِ قُدُومِهِ , meaning مَا شَعَرْتُ [I knew not, &c., the tidings of his coming, or arrival]. (TA.) اعتلمهُ , also, signifies عَلِمَهُ [He knew it; &c.]. (K.) And one says تَعَلَّمْ in the place of اِعْلَمْ [Know thou; &c.]: ISk says, تَعَلَّمْتُ أَنَّ فُلَانًا خَارِجٌ is a phrase used in the place of عَلِمْتُ [as meaning I knew, or, emphatically, I know, that such a one was, or is, going forth]; adding, [however,] when it is said to thee, اِعْلَمْ أَنَّ زَيْدًا خَارِجٌ [Know thou that Zeyd is going forth], thou sayest قَدْ عَلِمْتُ [lit. I have known, meaning I do know]; but when it is said, تَعَلَّمْ أَنَّ زَيْدًا خَارِجٌ , thou dost not say, قَدْ تَعَلَّمْتُ ; (S:) accord. to IB, these two verbs are not used as syn. except in the imperative forms: (TA:) [or] عَلِمَ الأَمْرَ and تَعَلَّمَهُ are syn. as signifying أَتْقَنَهُ [app. meaning he knew, or learned, the case, or affair, soundly, thoroughly, or well: see art. تقن : but I think it not improbable, though I do not find it in any copy of the K, that the right reading may be أَيْقَنَهُ , which is syn. with تَيَقَّنَهُ ; an explanation of عَلِمَ in the Msb, as mentioned above, being تَيَقَّنَ ]. (K, TA.) And تعالمهُ الجَمِيعُ means عَلِمُوهُ [i. e. All knew him; &c.]. (S, K.) وَأَعْلَمُ عِلْمَ اليَوْمِ وَٱلْأَمْسِ قَبْلَهُ | وَلٰكِنِّنِى عَنْ عِلْمِ مَا فِى غَدٍ عَمِ عَلِمْتُ عِلْمَهُ [lit. I knew his knowledge, or what he knew, app. meaning I tried, proved, or tested, him, and so knew what he knew; and hence I knew his case or state or condition, or his qualities;] is a phrase mentioned by Fr in explanation of رَبَأْتُ فِيهِ . (TA voce رَبَأَ , q. v. See also the explanation of لَأَ خْبُرَنَّ خَبَرَكَ , in the first paragraph of art. خبر : and see غَبَنُوا خَبَرَهَا , in art. غبن .) عَلِمْتُ is also used in the manner of a verb signifying swearing, or asseveration, so as to have a similar complement; as in the saying, 1 [And I certainly knew that thou wouldst, or that she would, assuredly come in the evening]. (TA in art. شهد .) And يَعْلَمُ ٱللّٰهُ [God knoweth] is a form of asseveration. (IAth, TA voce قَيْرَوَانٌ : see an ex. in art. قير .) وَلَقَدْ عَلِمْتُ لَتَأْتِيَنَّ عَشِيَّةً عَلُمَ , agreeably with what is said in the M, which is عَلُمَ هُوَ نَفْسُهُ , accord. to the K عَلِمَ هُوَ فِى نَفْسِهِ , but the verb in this case is correctly like كَرُمَ , (TA,) He was, or became, such as is termed عَالِم and عَلِيم ; (M, * K, * TA;) meaning he possessed knowledge ( العِلْم ) as a faculty firmly rooted in his mind: (IJ, * TA:) accord. to IB, i. q. تعلّم [q. v., as intrans.]: and he was, or became, equal to the عُلَمَآء [pl. of عَالِمٌ and of عَلِيمٌ ]. (TA.) عَالَمَهُ فَعَلَمَهُ , aor. عَلُمَ : see 3. عَلَمَهُ , aor. عَلُمَ and عَلِمَ , (K,) inf. n. عَلْمٌ , (TA.) signifies He marked it; syn. وَسَمَهُ . (K.) And one says, عَلَمْتُ عِمَّتِى , meaning I wound my turban upon my head with a mark whereby its mode should be known. (TA.) [See also 4.] عَلَمَ شَفَتَهُ , aor. عَلِمَ , (S, K,) inf. n. عَلْمٌ , (S,) He slit his [upper] lip. (S, K.) عَلِمَ , aor. عَلَمَ , (S, Msb, K,) inf. n. عَلَمٌ , (S, Msb,) He (a man, S) had a fissure in his upper lip: (S, Msb, K:) or in one of its two sides. (K.)