muḍāriʿـَيَفْعَلُ·ـُيَفْعُلُmaṣdarسَفَهٌ
Core sense — he was, or became, lightwitted, unwise, or foolishgenerated
1.1
maṣdar سَفَهٌ, سَفَاهَةٌ, and سَفَاهٌ. The MA gives all three maṣdars for the first verb, and so does the TA when that verb is transitive; but properly the first belongs to the first verb, and the second and the third to the second verb.
He (a man) was, or became, such as is called سَفِيه: that is, he was, or became, unwise, witless, lacking wisdom or understanding, or rather lightwitted.
1.1.1he was lightwitted in himself, or in his mind—سَفِهَ نَفْسَةُ
An instance of this phrase occurs in the Kur 2:124. Similar to it are غَبِنَ رَأْيَهُ, بَطِرَ عَيْشَهُ, أَلِمَ بَطْنَهُ, وَفِقَ أَمْرَهُ, and رَشِدَ أَمْرَهُ.
It was originally سَفِهَتْ نَفْسُ زَيْدٍ [or rather سَفِهَتْ نَفْسُهُ, i. e. himself, or his mind, was, or became, lightwitted, &c.]; but when the dependence of the verb was transferred from the نفس to the man, what followed the verb was put in the accusative as its object, because the phrase became identical in meaning with سَفَّهَ نَفْسَهُ [he made himself, or his mind, lightwitted, &c.]. So say the Basrees and Ks, and they allow this accusative to come before the verb, just as one may say غُلَامَهُ ضَرَب زَيْدٌ.
According to the K the verb thus used has three forms: one says سَفِهَ نَفْسَهُ, رَأْيَهُ, حِلْمَهُ, سَفُهَ, and سَفَهَ, meaning حَمَلَهُ عَلَىالسَّفَهِ [which is virtually the same as سَفَّهَهُ, i. e. he made himself, or his mind, lightwitted, or unwise, &c., and in the same way his judgment, or opinion, and he turned his gravity, or forbearance, into levity, or hastiness].
Or he attributed سَفَه [lightwittedness, &c., to himself, or his mind, and to his judgment, or opinion]. Or he destroyed it, which agrees with the meaning AO assigns to سَفِهَ نَفْسَهُ. Or it means he held himself in mean, or light, estimation, and made himself low, base, or contemptible.
But Lh says that سَفِهَ نَفْسَهُ with kesr [to the ف], maṣdar سَفَهٌ, سَفَاهَةٌ, and سَفَاهٌ, means حَمَلَهُ عَلَى السَّفَهِ [or حَمَلَهَا], and is the approved form, and that some say سَفُهَ, which is rare.
According to J and others, when they say سفه نَفْسَهُ and رَأْيَهُ they say it only with kesr [to the ف], because فَعُلَ is not transitive; so the three forms of the verb given in the K need looking into.
According to Fr, when the dependence of the verb in the phrase سَفِهَ نَفْسَهُ was transferred from the نفس to its possessor, what followed the verb became a specifying word, showing that the سَفَه [the lightwittedness, &c.] was in it. By rule it should be سَفِهَ زَيْدٌ نَفْسًا, since a specifying word should be indefinite; but it was left as a prefixed noun and put in the accusative in the manner of an indefinite noun, being likened to one. On his view, then, the meaning is: he was, or became, lightwitted as to his mind. He does not allow this accusative to come before the verb, however, because a specifying word may not precede.
Similar to this is the phrase ضِقْتُ بِهِ ذَرْعًا and طِبْتُ بِهِ نَفْسًا, meaning ضَاقَ ذَرْعِىبِهِ and طَابَتْ نَفْسِى بِهِ. But this saying of Fr is rejected by the grammarians, who say that specifying words are indefinite and that definite nouns may not be used as indefinite.
Some grammarians say that إِلَّامَنْ سَفِهَ نَفْسَهُ in the Kur 2:124 means الّا من سَفِهَ فِىنَفْسِهِ [but he who is lightwitted, &c., in his mind], that is, who becomes سَفِيه, the preposition فى being suppressed and the noun therefore put in the accusative by the general rule.
Zj holds that the preferable view is that it means إِلَّا مَنْ جَهِلَ نَفْسَهُ, that is, but he who is ignorant, or silly, or foolish, or unreflecting in his mind.
In the same way سَفِهَ رَأْيَهُ means جَهِلَهُ [he was ignorant, &c., in his judgment, or opinion], and his judgment, or opinion, was unsound and without rectitude.
سَفِهَ نَفْسَهُ also means he lost himself, or his own soul.
سَفِهَ الحَقَّ is likewise explained as meaning سَفَّهَ الحَقَّ [he made the truth, or right, to be foolishness, or the like]. Yoo held each to be a variant of the other, and the measure of the first verb to be intensive; and on this explanation one may say سَفِهْتُ زَيْدًا, meaning سَفَّهْتُ زَيْدًا [I pronounced Zeyd lightwitted, &c.]. Or the meaning is جَهِلَ الحَقَّ [he ignored the truth, or right], and he did not see it to be the truth, or right; or he regarded the truth, or right, as foolishness, or ignorance. See the article غمط.
See also form 2.
Qur’ān 2:130 approximate — somewhere between 2:128 and 2:143 Lane cites “Kur ii. 124”
Lane cites “Bd in ii. 124” — a commentary, not the verse; no modern number is given
Qur’ān 2:130 the verse Lane’s citation points to, and it uses this root
وَمَن يَرْغَبُ عَن مِّلَّةِ إِبْرَٰهِـۧمَ إِلَّا مَن سَفِهَ نَفْسَهُۥ ۚ وَلَقَدِ ٱصْطَفَيْنَـٰهُ فِى ٱلدُّنْيَا ۖ وَإِنَّهُۥ فِى ٱلْـَٔاخِرَةِ لَمِنَ ٱلصَّـٰلِحِينَAnd who turns away from the religion of Abraham but such as debase their souls with folly? Him We chose and rendered pure in this world: And he will be in the Hereafter in the ranks of the Righteous.Abdullah Yusuf Ali, The Holy Qur’ān (1934)
1.1.2he feigned ignorance to him—سَفِهَ عَلَيْهِ
Equivalent to جَهِلَ; it has this meaning when made transitive by means of عَلَى. سَفُهَ and تسافه are used in the same way.
1.1.3I forgot my share, or portion—سَفِهْتُ نَصِيبِى
The K implies that one says سَفَهْتُ نصيبى as well, but only the first is supported by the TA.
1.1.4he overcame his companion—سَفَهَ صَاحِبَهُ
. The contest is what is termed مُسَافَهَة, the maṣdar of form 3.
One says سَافَهَهُ فَسَفَهَهُ.
1.1.5figurative · مجازthe spear-wound, or the like, gave out blood that came quickly and dried up—سَفِهَتِ الطَّعْنَةُ
. Explained by وَجَفَّ [in the TK وِخف]; so in the A.
1.1.6figurative · مجازhe drank much of the beverage, or wine, without his thirst being satisfied—سَفِهَ الشَّرَابَ
. See also form 3.
he drank the water immoderately—سَفِهَ المَآءَ
1.1.7I was occupied, or busied, or diverted from a thing—سَفِهْتُ
I was occupied, or busied, or diverted from a thing—سَفَهْتُ
Both are explained by شُغِلْتُ. Some copies of the K have شَغَلْتُ, but the right reading is شُغِلْتُ.
Or, according to the copies of the K, تَشَغَّلْتُ, but correctly شَغَلْتُ [i. e. I occupied, or busied, or diverted from a thing].
Qur’ānic occurrences Form 1
2:130
وَمَن يَرْغَبُ عَن مِّلَّةِ إِبْرَٰهِـۧمَ إِلَّا مَن سَفِهَ نَفْسَهُۥ ۚ وَلَقَدِ ٱصْطَفَيْنَـٰهُ فِى ٱلدُّنْيَا ۖ وَإِنَّهُۥ فِى ٱلْـَٔاخِرَةِ لَمِنَ ٱلصَّـٰلِحِينَAnd who turns away from the religion of Abraham but such as debase their souls with folly? Him We chose and rendered pure in this world: And he will be in the Hereafter in the ranks of the Righteous.
Occurrences of this form in the Qur’ān, not Lane’s choice of verse. They show the word in use; they do not say which sense above applies. Where more occur than are shown, the shortest āyāt are chosen.
Show Lane's original text
, (S, MA, Msb,) aor. سَفَهَ ; (Msb;) and سَفُهَ , [aor. سَفُهَ ;] (S, Msb;) inf. n. سَفَهٌ and سَفَاهَةٌ (S, MA, Msb, K *) and سَفَاهٌ , (S, MA, K, *) [all mentioned in the MA as of the former verb, and so in the TA when that verb is trans., but properly] the first is of the former verb, and the second is of the latter verb, (S, Msb,) and so is the third; (S;) He (a man, S) was, or became, such as is termed سَفِيه ; (S, TA;) [i. e.] he was, or became, unwise, witless, or destitute of wisdom or understanding, or [rather] lightwitted. (MA.) The phrase سَفِهَ نَفْسَةُ , [of which an instance occurs in the Kur ii. 124, and] to which غَبِنَ رَأْيَهُ and بَطِرَ عَيْشَهُ and أَلِمَ بَطْنَهُ and وَفِقَ أَمْرَهُ and رَشِدَ أَمْرَهُ are similar, was originally سَفِهَتْ نَفْسُ زَيْدٍ [or rather سَفِهَتْ نَفْسُهُ i. e. Himself, or his mind, was, or became, lightwitted, &c.]; but when [the dependence of] the verb became transferred [from the نفس ] to the man, what followed the verb was put in the accus. case by being its objective complement, for the phrase became identical in meaning with سَفَّهَ نَفْسَهُ [he made himself, or his mind, lightwitted, &c.]: so say the Basrees and Ks; and it is allowable with them to make this accus. to precede [the verb]; like as it is allowable to say, غُلَامَهُ ضَرَب زَيْدٌ : (S, TA:) accord. to the K, the verb thus used has three forms; (TA;) you say سَفِهَ نَفْسَهُ and رَأْيَهُ , (K, TA,) and حِلْمَهُ , (TA,) and سَفُهَ , and سَفَهَ , meaning حَمَلَهُ عَلَىالسَّفَهِ [which is virtually the same as سَفَّهَهُ i. e. he made himself, or his mind, lightwitted, or unwise, &c., and in like manner his judgment, or opinion, and he made his gravity, or forbearance, or the like, to become levity, or hastiness, &c.]: or he attributed سَفَه [i. e. lightwittedness, &c., to himself, or his mind, and to his judgment, or opinion]: or he destroyed it; (K, TA;) agreeably with the meaning assigned to سَفِهَ نَفْسَهُ by AO: (TA:) or this means he held himself in mean, or light, estimation; (MA, and Ksh and Bd in ii. 124;) and rendered himself low, base, or contemptible: (Bd ibid.:) but Lh says that سَفِهَ نَفْسَهُ , with kesr [to the ف ], inf. n. سَفَهٌ and سَفَاهَةٌ and سَفَاهٌ , means حَمَلَهُ عَلَى السَّفَهِ [or حَمَلَهَا ], and is the approved form, and that some say سَفُهَ , which is rare: and accord. to J and others, (TA,) when they say سفه نَفْسَهُ , and رَأْيَهُ , they do not say it otherwise than with kesr [to the ف ], because فَعُلَ is not trans.: (S, TA:) so that the three forms of the verb mentioned in the K require consideration: (TA:) accord. to Fr, when [the dependence of] the verb in the phrase سَفِهَ نَفْسَهُ became transferred from the نفس to the possessor thereof, what followed the verb became an explicative, to indicate that the سَفَه [or lightwittedness, &c.,] was therein; and by rule it should be سَفِهَ زَيْدٌ نَفْسًا , for the explicative should not be otherwise than indeterminate; but it was left in its state of a prefixed noun, and put in the accus. case in the manner of an indeterminate noun as being likened thereto; [the meaning, therefore, accord. to him, is he was, or became, lightwitted, &c., as to his mind;] it is not allowable, however, in his opinion, to make this accus. to precede [the verb], because the explicative may not precede; and similar to this is the phrase ضِقْتُ بِهِ ذَرْعًا , and طِبْتُ بِهِ نَفْسًا , meaning ضَاقَ ذَرْعِىبِهِ and طَابَتْ نَفْسِى بِهِ : (S, TA:) but this saying [of Fr] is disallowed by the grammarians; for they say that explicatives are indeterminate, and that determinate nouns may not be used as indeterminate: some of the grammarians say that إِلَّامَنْ سَفِهَ نَفْسَهُ in the Kur [ii. 124] means الّا من سَفِهَ فِىنَفْسِهِ [but he who is lightwitted, &c., in his mind], i. e., who becomes سَفِيه ; [the prep.] فى being suppressed [and the noun therefore put in the accus. case agreeably with a general rule]: Zj holds that the approvable saying is, that it means إِلَّا مَنْ جَهِلَ نَفْسَهُ , i. e., but he who is [ignorant or silly or foolish or] unreflecting in his mind: and in like manner, سَفِهَ رَأْيَهُ means جَهِلَهُ [i. e. he was ignorant, &c., in his judgment, or opinion]; and his judgment, or opinion, was unsound, without rectitude: and سَفِهَ نَفْسَهُ signifies also he lost himself, or his own soul. (TA.) سَفِهَ الحَقَّ is likewise expl. as meaning سَفَّهَ الحَقَّ [He made the truth, or right, to be foolishness, or the like]; and Yoo held the one to be a dial. var. of the other, and the measure of the former verb to denote intensiveness; and accord. to this explanation one may say, سَفِهْتُ زَيْدًا meaning سَفَّهْتُ زَيْدًا [I pronounced Zeyd lightwitted, &c.]: or the meaning is جَهِلَ الحَقَّ [he ignored the truth, or right], and he did not see it to be the truth, or right: (TA:) or he regarded the truth, or right, as foolishness, or ignorance. (S and TA in art. غمط .) See also 2. سَفِهَ عَلَيْهِ signifies جَهِلَ [i. e., when thus trans. by means of عَلَى , He feigned ignorance to him]; as also سَفُهَ , (K, TA,) and تسافه . (K.) And سَفِهْتُ نَصِيبِى [and it is implied in the K that one says سَفَهْتُ نصيبى also, but only the former is authorized by the TA,] I forgot my share, or portion. (Th, K, TA.) And سَفَهَ صَاحِبَهُ , aor. سَفُهَ , He overcame his companion in what is termed مُسَافَهَة [inf. n. of 3, q. v.]. (K.) You say, سَافَهَهُ فَسَفَهَهُ . (TA.) سَفِهَتِ الطَّعْنَةُ , (JK, K, TA,) inf. n. سَفَهٌ , (TA,) The spear-wound, or the like, emitted blood which came from it quickly (JK, K, TA) and dried up ( وَجَفَّ [in the TK وِخف ]): (K, TA:) so in the A. (TA.) سَفِهَ الشَّرَابَ , (S, K,) inf. n. سَفَهٌ , (TA,) He drank much of the beverage, or wine, without having his thirst satisfied thereby. (S, K, TA.) See also 3. And سَفِهَ المَآءَ He drank the water immoderately. (TA.) And سَفِهْتُ and سَفَهْتُ signify شُغِلْتُ , (so in the CK,) in [some of] the copies of the K شَغَلْتُ , but the right reading is شُغِلْتُ [i. e. I was occupied, or busied, or diverted from a thing]: or, accord. to the copies of the K, تَشَغَّلْتُ ; but correctly, or شَغَلْتُ [i. e. I occupied, or busied, or diverted from a thing]. (TA.)